While there are all kinds of doctors, scientists, and would-be proclaimers of what’s going on behind or with the COVID-19 pandemic, there are others who are not that well known or made as available to the world at large (or even just to this country) who also have something to say — and what these doctors have to say will leave all the others scratching their heads or pooh-pooh-ing their messages for all the usual reasons: they do not resonate with others who have a different message; it might make those who responded to this pandemic in a major and even drastic way look foolish; it won’t make anyone any money; and besides, how do we know how much validity we should place on these alternate comments?
The first doctor who goes against the mainstream regarding the whys and wherefores of this novel coronavirus is Dr. Thomas Cowan. His credentials state that he has served as vice president of the Physicians Association for Anthroposophical Medicine and is a founding board member of the Weston A. Price Foundation. During his career, he has studied and written about many subjects in medicine. These include nutrition, anthroposophical medicine and herbal medicine. He is the author of three books published by Chelsea Green: Cancer and the New Biology of Water; Vaccines, Autoimmunity and the Changing Nature of Childhood Illness, and Human Heart, Cosmic Heart. He graduated from Michigan State University College of Human Medicine in 1984. After his residency in Family Practice at Johnson City Hospital in Johnson City, New York, he set up an anthroposophical medical practice in Peterborough, New Hampshire.
In a video, Dr. Cowan discusses his theory behind what a virus is in general, and how this correlates to what we are seeing today with increased electrification of the planet. Dr. Cowan’s theories around viruses line up with emerging research in the space of viral and exosome science. You can see this video and the others mentioned in this column on the Collective Evolution website. Dr. Wolfgang Wodargm, the second doctor, a well known pulmonologist, shares his thoughts on the new coronavirus. In his video, he questions the current lockdown measures being taken by governments worldwide. He also questions the statistics used to ascertain how we determine the actual victims of this pandemic.
His is also an opinion. Why are expert opinions like this being ridiculed, and sometimes even flagged as ‘false information’ when they are simply the opinions of medical experts? Why are people who ask questions constantly judged and demonized?
Even media outlets like Collective Evolution (from which all this information was taken), who share the opinions of these experts, are flagged, demonetized and hit with a limited reach.
According to Dr. Ron Paul. people should ask themselves whether the actual danger of the disease is massively exaggerated by those who seek to profit — financially or politically — from the ensuing panic. He was flagged by fact-checkers for simply sharing his opinion.
This is not to say the disease is harmless. Without question some people will die from the current novel coronavirus. Those in vulnerable categories should take precautions to limit their risk of exposure.
As far as the current coronavirus scare the world seems to be in, Collective Evolution has been writing about it for quite some time, and sharing why what they are seeing around the world is indeed questionable, and in many cases, doesn’t make much sense on multiple levels. But that is their opinion, and that being said, it can easily be argued that the opposite side of that opinion may also make sense. Differing opinions create discussion.
Facts are facts, and data is data, and at the end of the day the facts and data about the new coronavirus, other existing coronaviruses, and other diseases/viruses that spread rapidly and infect millions of people around the globe may not justify what’s happening right now with regards to all of the ‘lockdown measures.’ Those are some opinions, and sometimes opinions lead to truth while sometimes not.
The other doctor who made a video on this subject, Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, a specialist in microbiology and one of the most cited research scientists in German history, shared his thoughts on the measures that are being taken to combat the new coronavirus. He called them “Draconian. In his video he addresses many points being made, including hospitals being overwhelmed, and more.
Bhakdi created a Youtube channel on March 18th, and has since posted four videos that have received more than one million views, total, in a very short span of time. He recently uploaded what appears to be his last video, and reads an open letter from him to the German Chancellor. His sentiments echo those of three Stanford professors of medicine who recently shared their expert opinion that extraordinary claims require extraordinary data. You can read more about that specifically on the Creative Evolution website, and on The Creative Evolution Show, hosted by CE’s founder, Joe Martino.
Says Dr. Bhakdi: Implementation of the current draconian measures that so extremely restrict fundamental rights can only be justified if there is reason to fear that a truly, exceptionally dangerous virus is threatening us. Do any scientifically sound data exist to support this contention for COVID-19? I assert that the answer is simply, no.
Experts in the field of medicine are starting to come out making some very interesting points. Why is their opinion blocked and censored all the time?
It’s a very interesting time in human history. The birth of alternative media outlets has allowed information to spread across the globe, rapidly. Today, extreme measures have been taken and are being taken to label information as ‘false news.’ Granted, a lot of information out there is indeed false news, but media outlets are getting flagged, demonetized and censored for sharing information that is perfectly valid.
Intravenous vitamin C treatment for covid-19 patients is one of the latest examples, multiple media outlets claimed that it is very unlikely that it can do anything to help, and ‘fact checkers’ even flagged some articles providing evidence suggesting that it may.
Meanwhile, as far as Vitamin C treatment for Covid-19 goes, regardless of what some media outlets are claiming, Medicine in Drug Discovery, of Elsevier, a major scientific publishing house, recently published an article on early and high-dose IVC in the treatment and prevention of Covid-19. Vitamin C was successfully used to treat 50 moderate to severe covid-19 patients, and some New York hospitals have even started to use the treatment.
The author of that publication (mentioned above), Dr. Richard Cheng, has been updating everyone via his YouTube channel about vitamin C treatment cases out of China prior to the publication of his article.
Cheng also had a message for the ‘fact-checkers’ as posted in the description of his latest Youtube video. “I was made aware that FB Fact Check claims ‘Shanghai did not officially recommend high-dose IVC for the treatment of Covid-19.’ Let me make it clear that not only Shanghai, but also Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, another major city in China, publicly endorsed high-dose IVC for the treatment of Covid-19. Those who Fact Check, please be more careful.”
Thank you, Joe Martino and your Creative Evolution, for bringing the rest of the story, as Paul Harvey would say, to the people. Sometimes people need to be reminded just what an opinion is, while also learning to recognize facts.
Maramis Choufani is the Managing Editor of the Las Vegas Tribune. She writes a weekly column in this newspaper. To contact Maramis, email
her at firstname.lastname@example.org.