Judge William Kephart has inherited a convoluted mess that was created by his predecessor, Judge Earl After filing the above Motion an objection was received by the court, this Objection is based solely for fees that are not owed by the judgment creditor. The objection was filed by John Mitch Cobeaga a lawyer with no standing who claimed to be representing a judgment defendant that has no cause to make any claims over funds being held in[…]
The Las Vegas Tribune has been reporting on a Nevada District Court case that shows the corruption that exists in the courts as it progressed. When we first learned of the case, Feeley vs. Feeley, we knew there was something that did not appear right. The facts seemed very simple: a legitimate bank statement was requested to determine if misappropriation was occurring, and when thebank records were finally reviewed it did confirm that the Trustee of a New Hampshire Trust[…]
Are judges in Nevada ruling on cases by the law? Are the attorneys in Nevada made out of a unique cynic’s cold-blooded mentality or are they just plain cowards in cahoots with the judges that refuse to follow the law? Are the attorneys very afraid of the judges or are they just lacking in the necessary manhood to defend paying clients as they deserve to be defended? Every day this newspaper learns of one or two cases ofattorneys misrepresenting themselves with[…]
In the United States of America, the Gang of Eight is a common colloquial term for the bi-partisan group of eight United States Senators who wrote the 2013 comprehensive immigration reform (CIR) bill. The group was also instrumental in bringing Comprehensive Immigration Reform back to the legislative branch in the spring of 2013. However, in the country of Las Vegas, the birth of the Gang of Eight started with Wanda Feeley deciding to steal money that does not belong to her, but[…]
For months the Las Vegas Tribune has been exposing part of the judicial corruption and the cozy relationship between many of the judiciaries and the legal community where judges and attorneys, with great disregard for the clients, team up to benefit one another. In regard to the Feeley Trust Case in a Clark County court, a sitting judge, Allan Earl, broke all laws to help losing attorneys that did not deserve that help by perjuring himself and hijacking money that did[…]
Judge Allan Earl decided to participate in a scheme to convert Trust assets from entitled beneficiaries to unethical attorneys. The LasVegas Tribune has been relaying the events of the Feeley Case to readers for six months. Our staff believes that the results of the Feeley Case are so bizarre that it becomes nonsensical to try to figure out why a District Court Judge took the actions he did. The most pressing question is why the New Appellate Court would not[…]
Editorials · Our Point of View
The idea of an Appellate Court is to lessen the case burden on the Supreme Court and at the same time make a decision on whether a judge in lower courts was able to conduct a fair trial lawfully. We see one potential problem with that concept. The judges on the Appellate Court that was created just a year ago used to be co-workers with the same judge they now have to oversee. An Appellate[…]
